David Holz

Founder and CEO — Midjourney Co-Founder and CTO — Leap Motion

Listen — profile

0:00 / 3:09

Profile

David Holz is the founder and CEO of Midjourney, the AI image generator that turned a Discord bot into one of the most recognizable creative tools of the generative-AI era. His story matters to developers less for any single technical breakthrough and more for what it proves about how you can build an AI company: Midjourney reached a reported ~$500M in revenue by 2025 with roughly a dozen employees, no venture capital, no outside investors, and — for most of its life — no product beyond a bot you talked to inside a chat server. In a field where rivals raise billions and burn cash chasing scale, Holz built something profitable. That alone makes him worth studying.

Holz grew up in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, got hooked on programming as a kid (his origin story involves hacking Star Wars Jedi Knight to shoot rockets from his character’s hands), and studied applied math at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He left a Ph.D. program to build hardware, having earlier contracted for NASA’s Langley Research Center and done neuroscience research at the Max Planck Institute. In 2010 he co-founded Leap Motion (now Ultraleap) with Michael Buckwald, building hand-tracking sensors for computers and VR. That company was ambitious, technically impressive, and commercially disappointing — it was ultimately absorbed by Ultrahaptics in 2019. The Leap Motion experience clearly shaped Holz: a decade of chasing a hardware future that arrived slower than hoped.

What separates Holz from most AI founders is that he is not primarily a research scientist and does not pretend to be. Midjourney didn’t invent diffusion models; it out-executed everyone on aesthetics, iteration speed, and community. Holz has talked openly about running the company as a small, high-taste team optimizing for one thing — images people actually want to look at — rather than benchmark scores or a race to AGI. He frames Midjourney around three pillars he sees as central to the near future: reflection, imagination, and coordination. It’s an unusually humanist pitch from someone in a field dominated by scaling-law maximalism, and it’s a useful counterpoint for developers who assume the only way to win is to be OpenAI-sized.

For someone building with AI today, the lessons are concrete: distribution can beat funding (Midjourney rode Discord instead of building an app first), taste is a moat, and a tiny team with a tight feedback loop can out-ship the giants. Holz is now pushing Midjourney beyond images into video and world models, and has teased the company’s first hardware product — a return to his roots that will test whether the Midjourney playbook survives contact with atoms. He remains one of the more genuinely independent thinkers among AI founders, which is exactly why the copyright fights swirling around his company are so consequential.

Key Articles & Papers

David Holz — TIME 100 Most Influential People in AI 2025 2025 — TIME's case for why a bootstrapped, profitable image generator belongs alongside the industry's giants. An Interview with Midjourney Founder David Holz about Generative AI, VR, and Silicon Valley 2022 — Ben Thompson's long-form conversation on Holz's philosophy, from Leap Motion to Midjourney's design choices. Midjourney Founder David Holz On The Impact Of AI On Art, Imagination And The Creative Economy 2022 — Holz's early framing of AI as a tool to expand human imagination rather than replace artists. Midjourney Founder Admits to Using a 'Hundred Million' Images Without Consent 2022 — The candid remarks on scraped training data that still shape the legal case against Midjourney. Leaked: the names of more than 16,000 non-consenting artists allegedly used to train Midjourney's AI 2024 — The leaked artist database that turned diffuse anger into concrete evidence in litigation. Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement 2025 — The Hollywood studios' suit that made Midjourney a test case for generative-AI copyright.

Controversies

Training data and copyright. Midjourney, like its peers, was trained on a massive web scrape — reportedly drawing on the LAION datasets — that swept in copyrighted work without consent. Holz has been unusually blunt about this, describing the data as “a big scrape of the internet” and acknowledging the model ingested hundreds of millions of images from “open data sets.” Those candid admissions have been cited against the company ever since.

The leaked artist list and lawsuits. In 2023, artists filed a class-action suit alleging Midjourney could reproduce their styles without permission or compensation; the company’s motion to dismiss the core copyright claim was denied. In January 2024, a leaked spreadsheet naming more than 16,000 artists allegedly usable as style references intensified the backlash. In 2025, Disney and Universal sued Midjourney for facilitating infringement of their characters — a landmark case whose outcome could reshape how every generative model is trained. Holz has largely defended Midjourney’s approach as fair use of publicly available data, a position artists and studios sharply reject. The honest read: Midjourney built a genuinely great product on a data foundation whose legality is still being decided in court.

Note: I omitted the Videos and Books sections. Holz hasn’t authored books, and I couldn’t verify specific 11-character YouTube IDs for his talks with confidence — per the instructions, the script’s YouTube API step will populate that section rather than risk broken/fabricated IDs.